
Reuse: Architectures of Almost Nothing at La Laguna, Mexico City

Locus Architects: Climate Reparations in Mexico City

"Mexico City’s Locus Blends Vernacular Architecture with Climate Reparations," Metropolis, Fall 2025.
The way Sana Frini describes it, the heat waves engulfing Europe and the U.S. each year are like a creeping monster slowly moving northward. “The heat advances an average of one meter per hour,” Frini says. “So it’s something that you can literally see moving from the South to the North.” Measurable scientifically and no longer preventable, according to some activists and researchers, the climate crisis becomes a problem of repair and remediation. “Given the state of the world as they have left it to us, I consider myself very much within the discourse of repair,” she says.
Alongside Jachen Schleich, with whom she cofounded Mexico City–based Locus Architects in 2020, Frini has turned her attention to climate reparation, bringing an energetic perspective that borrows from vernacular techniques of subtropical regions to improve resiliency, conserve energy, and maintain the comfort of the human body.
“It’s a bit like the logic of experimenting, prototyping, but above all, analyzing, from a vernacular architectural perspective,” she says of her practice and teaching. “I really believe in an architecture that is not of the epoch of the Anthropocene or of the era of fossil-fuel production.”

Take Chinampa Veneta, Locus’s contribution to the 2025 Venice Biennale for the Mexican Pavilion, designed in collaboration with various landscape designers, architects, and farmers. It borrows formal and agricultural references from the pre-Spanish-conquest Aztec city of Tenochtitlan. Within the pavilion, Locus created a verdant living installation demonstrating the agricultural system of the chinampa—a food system used by the Mexica people to convert the pervasive wetlands of the Valley of Mexico into a productive landscape by using logs to cultivate food on top of artificial islands.
“[The chinampa] is something obvious to Mexicans, but for us it’s fascinating ... the whole logic of circular production and the impressive efficiency of this ecosystem. We found a parallel in Venetian culture.”

At the time when they won the competition for the Venice Pavilion, Schleich and Frini had recently completed a design for the Michelin-starred restaurant Baldío. The elevated eatery in Colonia Condesa serves zero-waste cuisine and uses ingredients sourced from regenerative agriculture in cooperation with Arca Tierra, an organization dedicated to reviving the chinampas.
Schleich had a connection to local wood craftsmen since his earliest days in Mexico City in 2006, when he arrived from Zurich to work on a set for a theatrical production. A graduate of ETH Zurich and the Polytechnic University of Catalonia, he met his future wife during that project and stayed on, eventually becoming a partner in a local architecture studio.
It was there in November 2016 that he met Frini—a self-described climate “nerd,” outsider, and polymath born and raised in Tunisia—who had pursued studies in architecture, urban studies, and political science in Carthage, Lyon, Seville, and Lisbon. “I flew to Mexico thinking I was coming on a yearlong contract, and I met Jachen the first day I arrived, in fact—it’s his fault,” Frini says. They became fast friends: They were both foreigners drawn to Mexico City’s architectural vibrancy and shared a passionate curiosity for material-driven climate solutions. They later left their respective studios to form Locus.
Alongside its architectural work, Locus runs a consultancy for developers and other architects, applying a sustainable living standard to help clients reduce energy, water use, and carbon emissions. “This gives me a chance to test what we preach with others as well as to test it internally,” Schleich tells me in the Locus office in the neighborhood of Juárez, overlooking the mountains to the south.

At the time of the Chinampa Veneta project’s conception, Frini was also deeply entrenched in cocurating, alongside Philippe Rahm, Four Degrees Celsius Between You and Me, an exhibition at the École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture of Versailles that explored climate adaptation in and around Paris. It is part of the Île-de-France Biennial of Architecture and Landscape.
“We proposed to bring the heat that already exists in the South to the North,” Frini says. “The context that motivated us and seemed really interesting was the phenomenon of the tropicalization of the Mediterranean and the Mediterraneanization of the northern part of the globe. It basically involves the tools that all these people in the Global South are working with.”
Like the Venice Pavilion, Locus adopted a collaborative model, inviting 15 universities, 58 architects, three cineasts, 12 writers, and one artist, to explore climate solutions, imagining Paris in the year 2100, anticipating summer temperatures rising by as much as 5°C. The exhibition again emphasized vernacular techniques originating from southern regions, such as the venting of hot air from buildings using traditional materials, thermal differentials, and the geometry of chimneys to produce cool interiors.
Rather than looking toward modern architecture, Frini believes real innovation today is emerging from precedents in southern regions, pre-industrial models that open the door to a much more efficient architecture not subject to the logic of economic globalization. “We were looking at how to cool ourselves faced with climate change on a global scale without depending on fossil fuel energy, using the logic and know-how of people who have already lived in these conditions for a long time,” she says.

Locus has quickly turned itself into a resource for climate-friendly design on the Mexico City architecture scene. For the expansive landscape intervention of Iñaki Echeverría in the Lake Texcoco Ecological Park—a major flood mitigation project for the government—the firm collaborated on a tropical, timber-framed building planned to house a culinary institute, using shou sugi ban surfaces to promote long-term durability. “It’s very hard and very resistant and requires few public resources for maintenance, because it won’t have almost any budget for maintenance,” Schleich says of the charred tropical timber. “It has to be almost indestructible in a way. This is also somewhat of a tradition of the Mexican government to make buildings so robust, which is why everything is concrete or hammered concrete. This is the wood version of that philosophy.”
Back in Juárez, redevelopment is happening all around Locus’s office. It’s hard to avoid the fact that many of the new restaurants in the center of Mexico City, like Baldío and Makan, appeal to an upscale clientele, while costs of living have increased far beyond the means of average local salaries. As older buildings are renovated and inexpensive lots are converted into luxury buildings, economic and cultural tensions have given rise to a potent antigentrification movement, accompanied by antiforeigner, antigringo, and anti-cultural-change speeches. While local building regulations and government policies are just starting to address the need for ecological design, affordable housing in popular neighborhoods, and regulations on Airbnbs, Locus’s dynamic office is a fitting reflection of the contemporary vigor of Mexico City, squarely focused on climate-sensitive design and practical solutions.

Iñaki Echeverria: Gardener of the Megacity in the Architect's Newspaper


Gardener of the Megacity: At Lake Texcoco Ecological Park in Mexico City, Iñaki Echeverria tests large-scale solutions for stormwater mitigation and improving biodiversity using modest natural tools, Architect's Newspaper, July/Aug. 2025.
Passive House Public Schools by ARO in Downtown Brooklyn

"Passive House Public Schools: PS 456/KGIA," Metals in Construction, Vol. 22, 2025.
Wedged between two large residential towers and two historic buildings on a constrained triangular lot negotiating between low-rise Boerum Hill and rapidly growing downtown Brooklyn, a pair of public schools meeting strict Passive House standards used 1,315 tons of steel and employed smart design, engineering, and construction phasing to create enough space for 850 students. The decision to aim for the highest zero-energy environmental standards added unusual complexity to combining two visually distinct schools in one 146,000-square-foot structure meant to last at least 100 years.
When the project at 80 Flatbush Avenue was announced by Alloy Development in 2017, local residents denounced the scale of the 74- and 38-story mixed-use towers, the tallest originally set to top out at 986 feet. At the center of the block, Alloy planned to partner with the city’s Education Construction Fund, which works with private developers to build public schools accommodating the city’s ever-growing school-age population, issuing bonds to finance construction. But citing the development’s scale, bulk, and proximity to a residential district, the local community board’s land-use committee voted unanimously against the necessary rezoning. Without it, the towers could only reach a maximum of 400 feet.
Four months later, however, the City Planning Commission approved the rezoning anyway. Then, spurred by elected officials mediating between local opponents and the developers, Alloy agreed to reduce the height of the tallest structure by 146 feet, still more than twice as tall as the zoning otherwise permitted. The rezoning quickly cleared the rest of the public review process. Six years later, in the fall of 2024, two new public schools built to Passive House standards and a 44-story all-electric apartment tower with 440 rental units opened their doors. (The 860-foot-tall tower has yet to be started.)
Architect and Alloy co-founder Jared Della Valle led the design of the towers but brought in Architectural Research Office (ARO) to design the school building, having previously collaborated with the firm on a single-family house for Syracuse University’s Near Westside green-home initiative. “We’re good at making complex things not seem complex,” said Stephen Cassell, an ARO principal and the lead designer for the project.
The architectural strategy centered on two principles. First, the educational buildings would have their own distinct presence instead of being hidden within the towers. Second, they would meet a Passive House standard for energy conservation, anticipating Local Law 31 requiring more stringent energy-use reduction coming into effect in 2020. The law mandates that public buildings in New York City reduce energy use by 40 percent by 2030 and achieve a net-zero threshold by 2050, putting the schools 25 years ahead of regulations.
To give each component its own identity, ARO designed the high school so it would appear as a floating cube appropriate for a broad thoroughfare like Flatbush Avenue, while crafting the entrance to the elementary school to step down to a brownstone block on State Street. A cocoa-colored brick rain screen facade, syncopated with recessed and projected planes and high-performing punched windows, gives an expressiveness to the exterior facing Flatbush, while employing a neutral surface material that doesn’t stand out extravagantly in the neighborhood. A mesh trellis will eventually be overgrown with plants, providing a visual buffer for the terrace outside a third-floor cafeteria. “We tried to make something that felt like a civic building and told high school students it’s their building in the city,” Cassell said.
The cantilevered entry to the 350-student progressive elementary school, Elizabeth Jennings School for Bold Explorers, has a more residential feel to it, buffered by flowering planters, and its lobby has a lower ceiling. Meanwhile, the front doors of the high school—the 500-student Khalil Gibran International Academy, which provides Arabic language classes—has a more cosmopolitan, urbane sensibility. Its lobby opens onto a public plaza facing busy Flatbush Avenue, and its terrace and ground-level retail spaces add urban activity and continuity to the nearby commercial corridor on Flatbush. “We wanted the high school students to be integrated into the liveliness of the city,” said ARO project director Dominic Griffin.
Inside, most of the elementary school classrooms are on the fourth and fifth floors, with the high school on the sixth and seventh, and the third floor split between the two schools, separated by a pair of doors. Kitchen services are shared, but the cafeterias and gyms for each school are autonomous, and the terrace outside the cafeteria gives the high school students a private outdoor social area.
Structurally, the steel framing of the combined building is relatively standard: slab on metal deck, with steel and concrete slabs acting compositely to make a stronger steel section. Girders that are 21 to 24 inches wide and steel beams 14 inches wide span distances ranging from 132 to 190 feet, supported by steel columns set 24 to 28 inches apart. Most of the foundations are concrete spread footings bearing on four-ton-per-square-foot soil. Select areas with high concentrated loads or lateral uplift use steel micropiles drilled into the soil.
To achieve Passive House standards, the structure employs thick insulation, high-performing windows, a tight envelope, and thermal breaks between the columns and the foundation, using high-density polyurethane pads to prevent thermal bridging and interrupt the transfer of energy through the structure. “We’re starting to see such energy-conserving strategies even in projects that don’t aim for Passive House standards,” said Jason Tipold, structural engineer and principal of TYLin.
Engineering the complex geometry of the site demanded some delicate balancing of lateral structural loads and strategic cross-bracing set back from the façade to prevent daylight from being blocked. But the trickiest aspect of the project came from the constrained building site. Traffic on Flatbush Avenue could not be blocked during construction, and a subway tunnel runs directly adjacent to the site beneath Schermerhorn Street. That meant there was nowhere for the crane to sit except on top of the base of the building as it was being erected. Crane engineers had to reinforce the first floor of the building with extra thick beams to absorb the weight of the crane and materials being lifted, practically making the building a part of the construction machinery. Simultaneous construction of the 44-story tower also required the careful staging of work.
The other distinctively reinforced parts of the structure are a customized gymnatorium—a combined gym and auditorium—lit from clerestory windows facing State Street, a top-floor gymnasium, and a recycled-rubber-floored rooftop play terrace framed with AESS stainless steel tubes and tensioned wire mesh to prevent balls from flying off the roof. Because of the 60 to 63 foot spans of open space, the ceilings of the gyms are supported by long steel trusses with wide flange members, welded together by Orange County Ironworks in their Montgomery, New York shop and delivered to the site on trucks with extended trailers. Many of the mechanical building systems were hidden in the trusses to save ceiling space for the gymnatorium. The stainless steel and mesh cage of the play terrace also had to be specified as architecturally exposed structural steel to withstand exposure to the elements.
Ultimately, these highly specific, customized elements that negotiate the constraints of the site give the schools a strong civic presence. “It was a lot more work but it makes it a better building,” said Cassell, “and creates a school where students have a sense of belonging, engagement, and pride.”
With the development’s yet-to-be-started tower anticipated to be the second tallest in all of Brooklyn, there’s little doubt the complex will remain abhorrent to some residents of Boerum Hill, despite the appeasement of public schools, exceptional environmental standards, and the 45 low-income rentals so far included. But the project has already provided dozens of rentals far below the market rate and a pair of public schools whose design and construction met demanding environmental standards, pointing to a bright future for high-performing city institutions.
Diller Scofidio + Renfro and the Fascist City in A + U
"The Legend of Avant-Garde Architecture and the Rise of the Market-Fundamentalist City," A + U, July 2025.
The evolution of Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s office, from Liz Diller and Ric Scofidio’s early interdisciplinary collaborations to the firm’s later work for major cultural, institutional, and business clients, tracks the systematic destruction of democratic society and the rise of market fundamentalist ideology.
The legend of Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s architecture dates back to the studio’s formation in the early-to-mid 1980s, when Liz Diller and Ric Scofidio participated in a series of avant-garde projects with sculptors and theater people as a part of Art on the Beach, an annual event sponsored by public art organization Creative Time, founded amid the collapse of the office tower market in Lower Manhattan in the early 1970s. The photographs of these open-air projects show a spectacular scene of installations and performances on a vast empty terrain in the shadow of the Twin Towers. Soil and granite from digging the foundations of the World Trade Center had been dumped on the edge of the Hudson River to create new land. It was a vacant space quickly adopted for artistic experiments, at least at first. The mythology of these events suggested that they became formative of innovative urban development more sensitive to public needs and desires than they otherwise would have been. City planners reengineered the ground and converted it into a neighborhood of mid-rise brick-faced upper-middle-class dwellings that included a significant land art project at South Cove by pioneering earth artist Mary Miss in collaboration with landscape architect Susan Child and architect Stanton Eckstut along its extensive waterfront walkway. But as Miss learned over the years, a visual artist’s public art interventions could easily be readapted, neglected, mistreated, scrapped, and redeveloped against her will—even those of a figure as renowned as Miss—threatening her built legacy.
Diller went a different way. She left the world of downtown avant-garde interventions behind. She mostly refuses to talk about those days—that was far in the past. Her office became an influential architecture practice, in 2005 adding as a partner Charles Renfro—a member of the team since 1997—who would bring significant technical and building expertise, new clients, as well as a spirit of mischievousness. DS+R once prided itself on never taking real-estate development projects like luxury housing, focusing on cultural and educational spaces. But over the years, it has increasing claimed major institutional and developer clients like Lincoln Center, Columbia University, real-estate behemoth the Related Companies, and search engine monopoly Google, producing significant new features of the landscape in New York City and beyond. They even have a project for the US State Department to renovate the embassy in El Salvador, now among the havens of crypto-fascist governance in Central America, collaborating with the Trump fascist regime in extralegal detentions of US immigrants.
Yet, somehow, DS+R maintained the avant-garde cache of those early years. Among their claims to fame, they share credit with James Corner Field Operations for the redevelopment of the High Line in 2009 as a pedestrian thoroughfare along a former rail line, which passes through the increasingly absurd real-estate spectacle of Chelsea. Supermodernist gestures like the staggered patterns of walkways, view corridors onto 10th Avenue, and concrete formwork seating that slants down and merges with the ground bear the hallmarks of the office’s techno-optimist style. DS+R designs with a self-assurance at times bordering on hubris that architectural solutions can mediate any programmatic challenge.
In 2013, they parleyed their High Line cache into a commission for a new park in Moscow at the footsteps of the Kremlin, on the edge of Red Square. In Zaryadye Park, a procession of Eurasian birch trees, grasses, and shrubs winds downhill from a glass-crusted outdoor amphitheater topping the new Philharmonic Hall, framing photogenic views of the candy-colored cupolas of St. Basil’s Cathedral. The park’s verdant terrain folds onto the rooftops of four scalloped pavilions that shelter a botanical display, an educational center, a food court, and a screening room for an immersive 3D film on Russian history. Granite pavers resembling the High Line’s pedestrian pathways stretch onto a boomerang-shaped overlook that cantilevers over the Moskva River, where visitors of all ages and groups compulsively photograph themselves against the backdrop of the Kremlin. Completed in 2017 with Citymakers and Hargreaves Associates, it was meant to function as a public space in the fullest sense, offering a place for Russian citizens to gather freely, express themselves, and potentially foment social and political change. It didn’t turn out that way—for now—as a few years later Russian president Vladimir Putin, a sponsor of the project through the office of Moscow’s chief architect, invaded Ukraine, leading to a total collapse of Russian civil society.
To a large extent, DS+R’s New York City work offers a US counterpart to that story. As politics in the US verged rightward year after year and the society became rapidly dominated by market-fundamentalist ideology, architecture followed. To get built, everything had to serve the interests of financial capitalism. If a project benefited Wall Street and real-estate developers, it was considered good for everyone. A complicated relationship with the rising oligarchy unfolded. DS+R’s Shed, a cultural venue within the Hudson Yards luxury housing, office, and shopping mall development—built on top of an active railyard on the western edge of Chelsea—came to life as a result of Liz Diller’s dedication. It was originally conceived as a generic cultural space of undetermined function written into the planning guidelines of the Hudson Yards special zoning district, which specified what form future development should take on the site. Hired by the real-estate corporation Related Companies—headed by a conservative Republican who enthusiastically endorsed and donated to Trump’s election campaign—DS+R for the first time accepted a luxury housing commission, designing an adjoining residential tower alongside the cultural venue. Diller would personally shape the program for the Shed as a place for challenging performances and exhibitions requiring expansive open spaces unavailable within existing theaters and museums. A section of the structure cleverly expands on rolling steel wheels into a public space bordering the High Line. Diller had to build the institution from scratch, gathering tens of millions of dollars in donations from billionaire oligarchs to fund its construction and programming.
DS+R’s academic buildings for the Columbia University School of Business confronted another potential headache in terms of its rationale. Two slightly abstracted sculptural volumes—the eight-story David Geffen Hall and the eleven-story Henry R. Kravis Hall—sit on opposite sides of a quad-like grass park designed by Field Operations, encircled by benches and a stage. Shapely floor slabs expressed in the facades use glass inset from the structure on the student levels and fritted glass on faculty levels to give their forms a distinctively fashionable flair. When it opened in 2021, the business school pitched itself as a progressive alternative to the prevailing market-fundamentalist economic theory: it claimed the college would nurture community-oriented values, mentor small businesses in Harlem, and provide ample public space open to everyone. But the Columbia University campus extension project had an ugly history.
The problem was that the humanistic claims of the business school sounded like hypocritical rationalizations given the undemocratic, anti-community development process the university deployed to expand the campus. The two new buildings joined an extensive medical school complex designed by Renzo Piano in erasing the neighborhood of Manhattanville. Acquiring seventeen acres from hundreds of existing property owners starting in 2002, Columbia ultimately used the state’s power of eminent domain to force landowners to sell their lots in 2008. This was explicitly against the local community board’s wishes. A group of small businesses sued in state court and lost.
By the time it opened in 2021, few people remembered the history of forced land sales and community opposition, but for those who did, no amount of beautiful architecture could compensate for the land expropriation used as a method of development. It would have been better if, within Columbia’s pristine new campus, a few spite houses of local mechanics plying their trade had survived among the Wall Street traders and tech startups designed to maximize shareholder value the school is churning out. To small businesses, the message of the project was clear: the wealthy and powerful could use their influence to get what they wanted. As in many of New York projects during the last decade, the possibility for a more diverse, more equitable city was being eliminated. Manhattanville was wiped off the map.
It was an echo of an infamous urban development project from another era. In the 1950s, New York City had built new cultural facilities for its major opera, philharmonic, chamber music, and ballet companies, along with a campus for Juilliard School of Music, hiring the most renowned architects of that time. Among them were Max Abramovitz and Wallace Harrison, close associates of the Rockefeller family—the major US oligarchs of that time—and Philip Johnson, scion of an aluminum manufacturing family and architecture curator at the Museum of Modern Art. To build the 16.3-acre development, the state had dispossessed 7,000 low-income predominantly Black and Puerto Rican families and 800 small businesses in San Juan Hill. It remains one of the more egregious examples of the early-to-mid twentieth-century state-run development process known as urban renewal, in which city planners used and abused their dictatorial authority to achieve public objectives. San Juan Hill completely disappeared.
When DS+R stepped in to realize a campus renovation masterplan for Lincoln Center starting in 2002, updating its public spaces for greater accessibility and openness, renovating and expanding the Juilliard school (2009), and designing a dexterous intervention, slicing through the façade of Alice Tully Hall to bring light into its lobby and create an urban plaza on Broadway (2009), no one expected them to restore the lost neighborhood of San Juan Hill. Eventually, a major renovation of Lincoln Center’s David Geffen Hall by Diamond Schmitt Architects and Tod Williams Billie Tsien effected a similar openness for the philharmonic building, adding a colorful mural on its northern façade, San Juan Heal by Nina Chanel Abney, as a gesture of remembrance of the violent urban development history. Architecture has limits of what it can do. It has little impact on public policy. But magical thinking about its beauty shouldn’t overwhelm our critical understanding of history. All of this development and redevelopment was funded by billionaires. The architecture tracks the systematic destruction of democratic society happening through the extreme concentration of wealth and the domination of economic and political spheres by the billionaire class.
More recently, DS+R designed new offices for the information monopoly Google, renovating a section of Pier 57 on the Far West Side of Manhattan, near the southern edge of the High Line. The design pitch, again, foregrounds the public-oriented functions of a few of the spaces—a rooftop garden and a food hall—with a visual openness toward the predominantly private spaces of the tech giant. The pier is owned by the Hudson River Park Trust, a nonprofit that operates the park along the west side of Manhattan. According to DS+R, the renovation “transforms an icon of New York’s twentieth-century maritime prowess into a democratic symbol of the city’s twenty-first century knowledge economy.” I would rather have Google share the wealth from its expropriation of advertising from print media. Among the industries systematically plundered by the way new “knowledge economy” now functions has been journalism, a theft of resources visible in the architecture and design press in grotesque ways, such as the lack of increase in the pay rate of journalists for at least two generations. A key sector of free society has essentially been destroyed, replaced with “information,” distributed without any regulation, tools of critical examination, verification, or protection against disinformation distributed by anti-liberal regimes. Google is a market-fundamentalist enterprise operating to produce short-term profits for shareholders. No matter how much the architecture offers transparency toward the inside, it cannot intervene in any meaningful way in the deeper social collapse that is being produced around it.
In October 2018, Diller collaborated with the poet Anne Carson, playwright Claudia Rankine, and the composer David Lang on the Mile-Long Opera, an extraordinary performance on the High Line hearkening back to her earliest work in Art on the Beach. Performers of especially diverse ethnicity and age groups (white, black, and brown, and many seniors) were arrayed along the entirety of the High Line, some of them singing in operatic voices, some expressing poetic lines naturalistically in their own voices. Actors were situated throughout the different levels of the pedestrian walkway, sometimes with dramatic new luxury towers under construction visible behind them, such as Bjarke Ingels’s twisting Eleventh tower. Carrying flashlights to illuminate the improvised staging, some of the performers were set off by street scenes of dumpsters piled with debris, others embedded in the complex landscape of the High Line, where the park extends onto a veranda and flows below the main promenade.
The mixture of everyday life, poetry, and operatic performance wove theater with the unscripted conversations of passersby, creating a visually compelling story evocative of the deeper resonances and political meaning of urbanism. It evoked the power of diversity and humanism as day-to-day experiences, difference and equality of opportunity embedded in the flow of urban society, the power of person-to-person interaction in public space as a mediating force for the democratic values of civic life. The piece recalled some of the values that are ultimately missing from the corporatized, privatized city colonized by tech billionaires, financial capitalism, and the now-predominant market-fundamentalist ideology of the US underlying the Trump fascist regime.
On Small Offices in Oculus, Summer 2025

Small Offices, Big Ideas: Working in a small office can result in greater attention to clients, close collaborative relationships, creative independence, and the ability to focus on projects that are meaningful and personally rewarding. The small offices spotlighted here demonstrate that you don’t need a large staff to make a big impact, Oculus, Summer 2025.
8 Minutes, 20 Seconds: Housing After Banking Encrypting the Sun by Michael Bell and Eunjeong Seong

8 Minutes, 20 Seconds: Housing After Banking Encrypting the Sun by Michael Bell and Eunjeong Seong. Edited by Stephen Zacks (Actar, Spring 2025)
Energy generated by nuclear fusion of the Sun reaches the surface of the Earth in 8 minutes and 20 seconds. 8 Minutes, 20 Seconds imagines an architecture based on renewable energy, caching forms of energy that are essentially inexhaustible and persistent, and virtually non-denumerable in quantity. It anticipates a post-scarcity era enabled and reorganized by a new form of housing that serves as an arbiter of post-sustainability human settlements.
Proposing a new form of housing only achievable through advanced manufacturing we ask: “what if what was a housing asset becomes a new form of energy asset whose downstream by-product is shelter?”
Metropolis 100 Community Design Student Projects

"These Students are Reclaiming Community Through Experimental Design: Future100 award–winning student projects reimagine what nurtures society—and what the traditional housing market neglects," Metropolis, June 2025.
Metropolis 100 Architecture Students on Healing Power of Water in Metropolis

"These Architecture Students Explore the Healing Power of Water: Design projects centered on water promote wellness, celebrate infrastructure, and reconnect communities with their environment," Metropolis, Jun. 6, 2025.
Five projects from this year’s METROPOLIS Future100 winners recognize water’s essential role in life, integrating the element into libraries, community centers, wellness retreats, and structures that showcase its impact.
Several students centered their projects on water’s restorative qualities. Marianna Godfrey’s proposal for a wellness retreat at Sweetwater Creek State Park outside of Atlanta, Georgia, attempts to repair the legacies of Cherokee expulsion and slavery by using the ruins of a brick manufacturing plant and cotton mill that used forced labor to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The University of Michigan M. Arch student’s idea is to extend the intervention above a natural stream while providing views and access to the water. The wellness retreat frames the encounters with the natural world as opportunities for meditation for individual and group therapy. “There are significant studies that indicate that any kind of landscape, nature, and water is very helpful for healing, particularly for PTSD treatment,” says Godfrey.
Likewise, University of Texas interior design master’s student Winnie Lin revitalizes a senior living facility in Austin, incorporating a spa retreat, lap pools, jacuzzi, and children’s pool into the structure to help treat arthritis and enhance community access. “Pools are a heavy part of Austin life, and in that area, there was not an accessible pool to the public,” Lin says. “With a diagnosis of arthritis, not only does a pool make sense for seniors, but as a site context, it also fits with the rest of the community at large.”
L.E.S. Ecosocialist Utopias for ABC No Rio 45 at Emily Harvey Foundation

Emily Harvey Foundation, ABC No Rio 45, A Fire in the Forest of Possibilities. Is ‘What If’ Now ‘What Was’? A Walk through the Utopian Loisaida Past and Present, “L.E.S. Ecosocialist Utopias,” Apr. 19. 2025.
The Fascist Assault on Academic Freedom Relies on Thinly Supported Claims of Campus Anti-Semitism on Substack
"The Fascist Assault on Academic Freedom Relies on Thinly Supported Claims of Campus Anti-Semitism," Substack, Mar. 27, 2025.
Do Not Buy US Products Under This Government on Substack

"Do Not Buy US Products Under This Government," Substack, Mar. 10, 2025.
Get Out If You Can Make No Compromise with the Nazi Republicans on Substack

"Get Out If You Can: Make No Compromise with the Nazi Republicans," Substack, Feb. 26, 2025.
Orchard House in Hudson Valley by IDSR Architecture in Dwell

"Budget Breakdown: The Foundation Is Also the Floor at This Shedlike $1.1M Hudson Valley Retreat: A concrete slab and corrugated metal siding root the energy-efficient home in an apple orchard with views of the Catskills," Dwell, February 14, 2025.
"Most of the architects of our generation were made aware of ecological concerns when we were brought up in school," says Rouhe, in part explaining why he and Ibañez de Sendadiano emphasize energy efficiency in their designs. (He’s a graduate of Southern California Institute of Architecture and Columbia University, and Ibañez de Sendadiano of Princeton.) "Still, there was a more formal agenda for the projects. Designing homes is more pragmatic in a way. It’s more utilitarian."
The Green Human Rights Agenda and the Future Democratic Majority on Substack

