![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG5gqgv20yE0mOZASi-Cauz5V1LH-naiUamgZsypr4D2wz0vVKC1zjpjKS84jgK_JPD6EUwhBX4dvy8mLS3NPiNueFE84VWI7z6iy6Wu_lDwLppnw5kS6ZdKxXtmeQqfj2PCUFynN2GWU/s640/WeishanWetlandPark.jpg)
Long-Term Plans: To Build for Resilience, We’ll Need to Design With—Not Against—Nature, Metropolis, January 2020.
Thirty years ago, as a high school student at the Cranbrook boarding school in suburban Detroit, I wrote a research-based investigative report on the environmental crisis for the student newspaper. I had been encouraged to do so by a faculty adviser, David Watson, who lived a double life as a radical environmentalist writing under the pseudonym George Bradford for the anarchist tabloid Fifth Estate. His diatribe How Deep Is Deep Ecology? questioned a recurring bit of cant from the radical environmental movement: Leaders of groups like Earth First! frequently disparaged the value of human life in favor of protecting nature.
Today, we hear some version of this more and more: Earth will continue to exist; nature will rebound, with or without people. It is resilient, we are not.